C-EEG Experience

Got home from Cedars-Sinai on Friday. The plan was to originally stay from September 10 to September 12, but stayed until Friday due to a few reasons. Overall, based on the C-EEG, Dr. Chung does not believe the events or episodes I had during the week are epileptic seizures which is a good thing. However, there is still a long road ahead.

On Monday, I checked and was taken up to my room in the North Tower. Once I got to my room, I was taken to a another room where the EEG tech placed the electrodes on my head. Each of the electrodes had wires that attaches on to a central unit which records and transmits the information/data received to a computer which processes the information. The insertion process didn’t take too long, like about 20 minutes. The glue used was somewhat bothersome mainly due to my now more sensitive olfactory.

Once all the electrodes were glued in place, the EEG Tech wrapped my head to hold them in place and to also make it more comfortable for me as well to sleep and lie down. The electrodes, while a bit uncomfortable were surprisingly comfortable. The only somewhat uncomfortable thing was the central unit I had to carry around. The length of the EEG cords to the central unit was only about two feet long. Luckily, the central unit had a loop I could sling onto my shoulder.

 Window view from my bed

Before I went back to my room, Dr. Shaw, a neurologists who works with Dr. Chung stopped by and explained the process. She said that whenever any symptom to press a the button at the end of a small cord extending from the central unit. Although my brain activity will be monitored the entire time, pressing the button will help them in focusing on certain portions of the data collected. Additionally, since my room has both audio and video monitoring, I should also state the symptoms I felt.

My view the majority of the time

So once things were set, I went back to my room and was confined to bed. I was considered a fall-risk patient and therefore I was placed in a “restrained” bed. A restrained bed is when the rails on each side of the bed is raised. Normally, only one rail on either side is raised. Also, since I was a “fall-risk” patient, a nurse or clinical partner always had to be with me whenever I wanted to get out of bed. So yes, even when I wanted to use the restroom. Most of the time, the bed detector alarm was set to go off to give notice to staff in the case someone got out of bed.

Yes, there was a lot of down time.

After settling in, my nurse went through a series of questions such as the types of symptoms I’ve felt, what I’m feeling now, etc…At the end of the questions, I made a remark that at least I won’t be poked this time around. The nurse said sorry and proceeded to stick an IV in me in the case that medication needed to be quickly given to me. It didn’t hurt at all really, but when the IV was stuck into my right forearm, blood gushed out everywhere and some got onto my sheets. I’d never been that much of a bleeder! Well, my sheets were quickly changed.

So I had a TV with basic cable and a Cedars-Sinai exclusive movie channel. And no, none of the movies had Lindsey Lohan in them. I could also use my laptop and any electronic devices. There had been some concern that while I could use my devices, I couldn’t have them charged near me as they might interfere with the EEG readings. However, the nurse cleared the matter up with Dr. Chung and having a charging device near me would not be a problem. Anyway, it turned out that I hardly used my laptop or phone and just read most of the time.

So, the important things. During my stay, I did experience some symptoms. My latest symptom of the week was a faint-like wooziness feeling. During my entire stay, the normal symptoms of the restlessness in my limbs, the heightened ringing in my right ear, and the racing of my heart did not appear. It’s a good thing they haven’t appeared in a while now (past couple of weeks), but I wished they would have just so I can put them to bed whether they are epileptic seizures, or just something else.

Day Five, electrodes without cap

Anyway, Dr. Chung came by every morning for brief chat and indicated that based on the data collected, that my symptoms were not epileptic seizures as my brain activity showed nothing out of the ordinary during my spells. This was good news to me, but also there’s some trepidation there as well. If they aren’t epileptic seizures, then what are they then? Also, just because these spells were not epileptic seizures, it doesn’t completely rule out that my prior spells were not. At this point, the next step is to taper me off my medication and see if that improves things. Since Vimpat has more pronounced side effects than Keppra, such as causing dullness, I will taper off of it first. Once I do, then I’ll taker off of Keppra. So if there aren’t any problems, I may be completely off both meds soon. I’ll be meeting with Dr. Chung again on Sept. 24 and will be receiving my schedule then. At that time, we’ll also go over the C-EEG data in a more detailed fashion.

During my stay, I also met a Dr. Jeffrey Wertheimer, a neuropsychologist at Cedars. As the name suggests, it us used to diagnose any neurological and psychological disorder(s) a person may have. Well, based on the evaluation, the physical manifestations I have aren’t purely psychological. The bad news is that there is an organic medical reason why they occur (e.g., surgery, radiation, medications). So at this point, Dr. Wertheimer agrees that tapering off the meds may help tremendously in alleviating some issues I am having.

Continuous EEG Video Telemetry Scheduled

The Cedars Sinai neurophysiology department called today and I now have a schedule for the continuous EEG video telemetry. It is scheduled for September 10th through the 12th. The stay may be shorter or longer depending on how things go, but the maximum number of days will most likely be five days if necessary.

I am a bit anxious. The EEG should provide a clearer picture of the cause(s) of my ongoing issues with these episodes I've been having. However, I am afraid of the "what if." The what if it doesn't and the unknown path that will come along with this.

Traveling down this long road of uncertainty, anything that provides a perception of certainty is certainly a sight for sore eyes. First it was the needle biopsy which would provide a diagnosis, then it would the craniotomy which would provide a more concrete diagnosis and also resection of the tumor, next came the radiation therapy which was part of the treatment protocol to manage the tumor, and now it's the EEG to assess that my episodes WILL be considered seizures and the established steps will be taken to treat these "seizures."

UC Health System and Blue Shield Come to Insurance Resolution

The UCLA Health Center and Blue Shield finally came to a resolution regarding the insurance flap between the two parties. Just a recap, the last contract between the two parties ended December 31, 2011 and all UC health facilities have been out of Blue Shield's network since then. Suffice to say, this has caused of a lot of stress for me along with, I'm sure, many other patients receiving care at UCLA and other UC health facilities. I am grateful for Blue Shield's Continuity of Care Services waiver program, but it has not been without it's share of problems and heartache. Starting September 1, 2012, the UCLA Health Center and it's affiliates will once again be within Blue Shield's network. The new contract will be effective through June 30, 2015.

At this point, I will remain at Cedars Sinai for now. One reason that has lessened any confusion on my part of whether to go back to UCLA is the good rapport between Dr. Lai and both Drs. Hu and Chung at Cedars. So far, the sharing of information between Cedars and UCLA has been seemless. Dr. Hu and Dr. Chung both know Dr. Lai well and have seem open in including Dr. Lai if need be. I contacted Dr. Lai about the news and he just wants what's best for me.

If for some reason, I do need another biopsy, this will be a tougher dilemma. I have read and heard that Dr. Wu at Cedars is a very well respected neurosurgeon who is also responsive to his patients. However, Dr. Liau at UCLA has set such a high standard that it would be difficult not to go back to her. Additionally, the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center nursing staff also set a  very high standard.

Overall though, I do feel very grateful that I now have choices again and UCLA is again on the table along with UCI and the other UC health facilities.

Brief Summary

A brief summary of what's been going on.

June (throughout) - Increased "episodic" activity

June 25 - Met with Dr. Lai for the last time to review my MRI scan which revealed everything stable though there were somethings that were disconcerting, probably due to my own concerns because of increased activity. From various cuts and angles, the tumor seemed slightly bigger. However, comparisons for April MRI to June MRI did not exactly match. Here is scan sent to me by Dr. Lai a couple days after our meeting. So thankful to have Dr. Lai as my doctor. This assuaged things somewhat.

So this was my last meeting as UCLA and Blue Shield have not yet come to terms on a new contract. We spoke about my options and I decided to go to Cedars Sinai. Dr. Lai agreed it's probably the best place to go. He knows several doctors over there and have good rapport with them so the exchange of information will be easier. The doctors Dr. Lai recommended were Dr. Hu (neuro-onco) and Dr. Chung (epileptologist).

July 10 - Met with Dr. Jethro Hu at Cedars for the first time. Dr. Hu will be my neuro-oncologist moving forward from here. Based upon his review of my scans, he also believed my tumor is stable. It's a relief to know that his opinion is consistent with Dr. Lai's. My next appointment with him is scheduled for August 21 of which I will also have my next MRI scan. Dr. Hu also increased the Vimpat dosage from 300mg up to 400mg to see if it might help with containing these episodes. So far it seems to have as my episodes have come down a bit. Haven't had one the past few days.

I'll be meeting with Dr. Chung on August 6 to discuss about my ongoing episodes and to see if a continuous video EEG will be needed. A C-EEG is where a person is hooked up and monitored for a 24-hour or longer period of time. This type of EEG may better determine if a person's episodes are seizures or not. The longer monitoring duration in itself increases the chances of "catching" a person's episodes. This, therefore, permits monitoring of a person's brain activity during their episode to determine if the activity is a seizure or something else.